Debt Collection

Can a debtor in Israel set off money the creditor owes them against the debt being collected?

Yes, where the debts are mutual and the statutory test is met. Section 53 of the Contracts (General Part) Law 5733-1973 permits set-off of debts arising from the same transaction even if the amount of one is still unfixed, and set-off of debts from different transactions only where both are liquidated sums. Set-off does not happen by itself. It operates from the moment one party gives the other written notice. In collection proceedings the debtor raises it as a defence, either in a statement of defence in court or in an objection filed at the Execution Office within the time allowed.

Two conditions do the work. The debts must be mutual, meaning each party owes the other in the same capacity, and the debt being set off must be liquidated unless both claims come out of the same transaction. A buyer who withholds payment because the goods were defective is usually inside the same-transaction limb and can set off an unquantified damages claim. A buyer trying to offset an unrelated commission dispute is not, unless that amount is already fixed. Israeli courts also treat timing strictly, so once judgment is entered a set-off argument that could have been pleaded as a defence generally comes too late.

Foreign suppliers meet this most often as the party on the receiving end. If an Israeli customer disputes quality and stops paying, expect a set-off defence, and expect it to survive the early procedural stages, because a claimed defect under the same contract satisfies the statutory test on its face. Send any set-off notice in writing and keep proof of delivery, since the right runs from notice rather than from the underlying breach. A clearly drafted no-set-off clause between businesses is generally enforced. Our guide to payment orders and objections in Israel explains where the defence gets filed.

⚖ In Practice
  • Governing law: Section 53, Contracts (General Part) Law 5733-1973; Execution Law 5727-1967 for objections and claims of discharge after judgment
  • Competent authority: Magistrates' Court or District Court (Beit Mishpat HaShalom / Beit Mishpat Mehozi) by claim value; the Execution Office (Hotza'a LaPoal) at the enforcement stage
  • Effective date: set-off runs from the date written notice reaches the other party, not from the underlying breach
  • Deadline: 30 days from service to file an objection to a fixed-sum claim opened at the Execution Office
  • Contract drafting: a clear no-set-off clause between businesses is generally upheld, so read the payment clause before relying on the statutory right

From the full guide: Payment Orders in Israel: Fast-Track Debt Recovery


Related Questions

Related Guides

Need legal help with this topic?
Get a Free Consultation with Adv. Eli ShimonyPrepared under the direction of Adv. Eli Shimony, Eli Shimony Law Office · Editorial policy

← Browse all Q&A