Does an arbitration award need court confirmation to be enforced in Israel?

An Israeli arbitral award does not automatically carry the coercive power of a judgment. Section 23 creates a confirmation step: the party holding the award applies to the District Court, which confirms it unless a ground to set it aside is established. The court does not re-examine the merits or ask whether the arbitrator decided correctly. Its role is limited to checking the narrow objections listed in Section 24, such as the arbitrator exceeding authority, a serious procedural defect, or conflict with public policy. If no such ground succeeds, the court confirms the award and it becomes enforceable. Our step-by-step guide to the arbitration process in Israel sets the confirmation stage in context.

For a foreign party, timing and forum are the practical points. The party resisting the award has a limited window, generally 45 days from receiving it, to apply to set it aside, and confirmation and set-aside applications are often heard together. A winner who wants to move quickly should file for confirmation promptly rather than assuming the award alone lets them freeze assets. Once the court confirms, the award is lodged at the Execution Office and enforced with the same tools as any judgment, including attachment, garnishment, and stay-of-exit orders. A foreign arbitral award follows a different track, being recognized and enforced under the New York Convention and the relevant regulations rather than Section 23. Getting the procedure right avoids months of delay between winning the arbitration and actually collecting.

From the full guide: The Arbitration Process in Israel — Step by Step

← Browse all Q&A