Labor Law

Can an Israeli employer dismiss an employee for trying to organize a union?

No. The Collective Agreements Law 5717-1957 bars an employer from dismissing an employee, worsening their conditions, or penalizing them in any other way because they joined, organized or were active in a workers' organization. Once the employee shows an initial link between the organizing activity and the employer's action, the burden shifts to the employer to prove a lawful and unrelated reason. The Regional Labor Court can issue an interim injunction preventing the dismissal from taking effect, order reinstatement, and award compensation without proof of damage. These rights apply to foreign nationals working in Israel on the same terms as Israeli employees.

Sections 33H to 33I of the Collective Agreements Law protect the act of organizing itself. They prohibit an employer from preventing an employee joining or being active in a workers' organization, from making employment conditional on staying out of one, and from harming an employee because of organizing activity. A parallel duty requires the employer to give the organization's representative reasonable access to the workplace during an organizing drive. The National Labor Court reads these provisions broadly, treating dismissals, transfers, sudden performance criticism and the withdrawal of benefits during a drive as suspect. The employer must then produce a documented, contemporaneous reason that has nothing to do with the union.

Foreign employees at Israeli companies are covered on identical terms, because Israeli labor law attaches to the place of work rather than to nationality. Two features change the practical calculation. First, the Labor Court hears urgent applications quickly and will restrain a dismissal from taking effect while the claim is heard, which is far less common in ordinary Israeli civil litigation. Second, reinstatement is a realistic remedy in organizing cases, unlike most wrongful termination claims where compensation is the standard outcome. Keep dated records of the organizing activity, of which managers knew about it and when, and of the sequence of events that followed.

⚖ In Practice
  • Governing law: Sections 33H to 33I1, Collective Agreements Law 5717-1957
  • Competent authority: Regional Labor Court (Beit Din Ezori LaAvoda), with appeal to the National Labor Court
  • Burden of proof: shifts to the employer once the employee shows an initial connection between the organizing activity and the employer's action
  • Remedies: interim injunction against the dismissal, reinstatement, and compensation without proof of damage up to approximately NIS 200,000 (2026), which the court may exceed with reasons
  • Speed: urgent applications for interim relief are commonly heard within days of filing
  • Coverage: applies to foreign nationals working in Israel on the same basis as Israeli employees

From the full guide: Trade Unions and Collective Agreements in Israel: What Foreign Workers Need to Know


Related Questions

Related Guides

Need legal help with this topic?
Get a Free Consultation with Adv. Eli ShimonyPrepared under the direction of Adv. Eli Shimony, Eli Shimony Law Office · Editorial policy

← Browse all Q&A